Dynamic thermomechanical analysis reveals improved damping in polyurea composite plates, indicating enhanced blast protection.
To address the challenge of balancing the damping performance with mechanical strength in conventional polyurea materials for blast mitigation, this study develops a constrained layer damping coating structure using Q413t viscoelastic polyurea (Q413t) as the damping layer and FPU-1 flexible polyurea (FPU-1) as the constraining layer. The mechanical behaviors of both types of polyurea were characterized through tensile testing at varying loading speeds, while dynamic thermomechanical analysis was utilized to evaluate their damping properties. A 75 g TNT contact explosion test and finite element simulation were employed to explore the protective mechanism. The results show that Q413t demonstrates significant strain-rate sensitivity under intermediate-strain-rate conditions, whereas FPU-1 exhibits minimal variation in mechanical strength. Q413t demonstrates a superior damping performance over a frequency range of 0–104 Hz. FPU-1 achieved a loss factor of 0.3 when the loading frequency reached 104–105 Hz. Under the 75 g TNT contact explosion load, the configuration with a 1 mm damping layer and a 3 mm constraint layer achieved a maximum displacement reduction of 35.26%. In the constrained layer damping coating, the damping layer contributes to blast protection through energy dissipation and load distribution, while the constraining layer reduces structural deformation by limiting displacement. Relative motion between the layers further enhances the overall damping performance. The constrained layer damping coating provides optimal blast protection when the damping-to-constraining layer thickness ratio is 1:3. The constrained layer damping coating enables the synergistic optimization of mechanical strength and energy dissipation, effectively mitigating structural deformation induced by blast loading and demonstrating promising engineering application potential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: