Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) affects multiple developmental domains, and early intervention is critical for optimizing long-term outcomes. Early intensive behavioral and developmental interventions (EIBIs/EDIs), including Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), the Early Start Denver Model (ESDM), and Pivotal Response Training (PRT), have emerged as key evidence-based strategies. This narrative review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions on cognitive, language, adaptive, and social outcomes in children under seven years of age, drawing from both primary studies and systematic reviews. Findings from meta-analyses and primary studies indicate that EIBIs and naturalistic developmental behavioral interventions (NDBIs) are associated with significant improvements in IQ (gains of 9-15 points) and language development. However, effects on core autism symptoms are more variable. Parent-mediated and lower-intensity intervention models show promise in maintaining effectiveness while improving accessibility. Despite these encouraging outcomes, variability in study designs, outcome measures, and individual responses highlights the need for more personalized approaches. The key gaps include limited long-term follow-up, inconsistent symptom reduction, and disparities in access. Future research should prioritize precision medicine frameworks, adaptive intervention models, and culturally responsive implementation strategies to enhance equity and maximize developmental potential for children with ASD.
Avula et al. (2025) studied this question.