Analysis reveals robust Sharpe ratios near 0.90 in market-neutral strategies, suggesting improvements in factor construction.
This thesis examines market-neutral, mean-reversion-based statistical arbitrage strategies in the Chinese equity market, using two factor decomposition methods: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and sector-based Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs). Residual returns are modeled as mean-reverting Ornstein–Uhlenbeck (OU) processes, generating contrarian signals. A 60-day rolling window ensures out-of-sample estimation. Realistic frictions are included via a 10-basis-point round-trip cost. Backtests from 2005 to 2024 compare four configurations: synthetic ETFs, fixed PCA, dynamic PCA, and trading-time volume adjustments. Both PCA- and ETF-based strategies deliver robust Sharpe ratios near 0.90–0.95. PCA portfolios perform better under high cross-sectional volatility, while ETF-based models remain stable during structural shifts. Incorporating trading volume enhances returns, especially for ETF models. Sensitivity analysis highlights the importance of threshold tuning and rolling-window lengths. These findings stress the critical role of factor construction and signal design in market-neutral strategies, suggesting further improvement via adaptive PCA and volume-weighted signals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ya Ping Sun (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: