Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Proposed ML method comparison protocols improve performance metrics in small molecule drug discovery, highlighting the need for rigor.
Machine Learning (ML) methods that relate molecular structure to properties are frequently proposed as in silico surrogates for expensive or time-consuming experiments. In small molecule drug discovery, such methods inform high-stakes decisions like compound synthesis and in vivo studies. This application lies at the intersection of multiple scientific disciplines. When comparing new ML methods to baseline or state-of-the-art approaches, statistically rigorous method comparison protocols and domain-appropriate performance metrics are essential to ensure replicability and ultimately the adoption of ML in small molecule drug discovery. This paper proposes a set of guidelines to incentivize rigorous and domain-appropriate techniques for method comparison tailored to small molecule property modeling. These guidelines, accompanied by annotated examples using open-source software tools, lay a foundation for robust ML benchmarking and thus the development of more impactful methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ash et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: