PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 12, 2025Archives of Acoustics5 citationsOpen Access

Listening Effort in Reverberant Rooms: A Comparative Study of Subjective Perception and Objective Acoustic Metrics

View Full Paper
APAnna PastusiakŁBŁukasz BłasińskiJKJędrzej Kociński

Key Points

  • Listening effort significantly varies based on objective acoustic parameters, with R2 values indicating nonlinear relationships.
  • The analysis showed a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.74 for speech transmission index, demonstrating its strength against subjective measures.
  • Experiments conducted in three rooms resulted in nine acoustic settings, revealing the complexity of the relationship between subjective and objective assessments.
  • Incorporating listening effort into acoustic design is crucial for understanding and enhancing subjective experiences in room acoustics.

Abstract

Modern room acoustics employs a variety of objective measures to characterize the acoustical properties of interiors. Despite these advancements, the relationship between these parameters and subjective assessments of room acoustics remains unclear. Subjective perception, particularly listening effort (LE), plays a critical role in how individuals experience acoustic environments, even when speech intelligibility (SI) is high. This study aims to bridge the gap between objective acoustic measures and subjective listening experiences. We conducted experiments in three rooms equipped with reverberation enhancement systems, resulting in nine different acoustic settings. Objective parameters, including reverberation time (RT), early decay time (EDT), clarity (C50), and the speech transmission index (STI), were measured. Additionally, subjective SI was assessed, and LE was rated on a 7-step Likert scale by 180 volunteers with normal hearing. The analysis revealed a nonlinear relationship between LE and both RT20 and EDT (R2 = 0.6), with an even weaker correlation for LE vs. C50 (R2 = 0.46). The Pearson correlation coefficient for STI was 0.74, compared to 0.55 for SI. These findings indicate that the relationship between LE and objective parameters, as well as SI, is complex and not straightforward. Our results suggest the importance of incorporating LE into room acoustic design and evaluation. The disparity between objective measures and subjective experiences suggests that LE may be a crucial factor in accurately assessing acoustic environments. This approach sheds the light on a more holistic understanding of acoustic quality that prioritizes human perception.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pastusiak et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d44b2231b076d99fa54060https://doi.org/10.24425/aoa.2025.154824
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper