Non-nested model analysis reveals depression affects gratitude in parent-child dyads, suggesting interventional strategies.
Abstract This study investigates the bidirectional relationships between family processes, gratitude, and depression in parent-child dyads by comparing three non-nested structural models grounded in intergenerational transmission theory. Using data from 310 Chinese parent-child dyads, structural equation modeling (SEM) tested three pathways: (1) family processes → gratitude → depression, (2) depression → family processes → gratitude, and (3) gratitude → family processes → depression. Model validity, cross-generational effect equivalence, and relative model superiority were assessed using the lavaan and nonnest2 packages in R programming within a unified framework. Results indicated that all models demonstrated significant direct and mediated effects with adequate fit (CFI > 0.90, RMSEA < 0.08), with Model 2 (depression-driven pathways) emerging as superior (CFI = 0.997, RMSEA = 0.013). Wald tests confirmed cross-generational effect equivalence (e.g., family processes → gratitude: W = 0.980, p = 0.322; all p > 0.0167, Bonferroni-adjusted), supporting intergenerational continuity. Crucially, simulation-based sensitivity analysis (N=250-500) not only affirmed robustness of the primary fundings but revealed stronger depression’s effects on gratitude in children than parents (Δβ=0.159-0.164 vs. 0.073), indicating heightened developmental vulnerability previously undetectable in the original sample. Results establish depression's pivotal role in disrupting family functioning and emotional well-being across generations, suggesting parental mental health interventions could disrupt cycles of familial dysfunction. Methodologically, this study advances the application of lavaan and nonnest2 packages for non-nested and nested model comparisons, offering a robust tool for evaluating competing theoretical frameworks. Full R code and simulated datasets are provided for replication and further research use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jerf W. K. Yeung (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: