Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative assessment identifies 32 risks in the Ulapan Electric Train project, suggesting effective mitigation measures.
Efforts to improve tourism in the ULAPAN area (Ubud, Tegallalang, Payangan) are carried out by connecting ULAPAN with other areas in Bali through the ULAPAN Electric Train Development Project Planning. Various risks are possible in the implementation plan of the ULAPAN Electric Train Development Project. To minimize the impact and possibility of risks in the ULAPAN Electric Train Development Project, risk management is needed. This study uses a qualitative research method, namely by brainstorming and interviewing parties involved and competent in the Electric Train Development Project with a total of 28 respondents. The likelihood of risk (likelihood) and the influence that occurs due to risk (consequences) are obtained through the answers given by the respondents, then a risk assessment can be carried out by multiplying the frequency mode value/likelihood of risk (likelihood) by the consequence mode value/risk influence (consequences). The risk identification obtained was 32 risks, namely 9 unacceptable risks (28.13%), 15 undesirable risks (46.88%) and 8 acceptable risks (25%). Dominant risks are risks that fall into the unacceptable and undesired categories. Proper risk management requires the allocation of risk ownership to related parties. Mitigation carried out against the risk of errors in construction time estimation with the largest risk value is by carefully recalculating and paying attention to priority work so that time is more efficient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoga et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: