Experimental analysis evaluates reactivation energy and coke quality in spent FCC catalysts, indicating potential for efficient chemical recycling.
Chemical recycling via catalytic pyrolysis is constrained by coke deposition and costly catalyst make-up. We investigate polypropylene (PP) and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) conversion over a spent FCC equilibrium catalyst (AXL) and, critically, quantify the re-activation energy landscape of the resulting coke. Using a semi-batch reactor (350 °C) and thermogravimetric analysis to 1100 °C combined with the Ozawa–Flynn–Wall method, we distinguish soft and hard coke under inert, oxidative, and sequential N2 to air regimes. LDPE yields mainly gas (70.7 wt%) with 5.5 wt% coke, whereas PP favors liquids (47.1 wt%) with 3.4 wt% coke. LDPE-derived coke is softer (71% of total; EA = 170 kJ mol−1 soft) than PP coke (60% soft; EA = 166 kJ mol−1), evidencing a more refractory PP residue. Oxygen lowers EA to ~155 kJ mol−1 for both polymers. We introduce a simple TGA-based “softness ratio” to guide regeneration severity and show that a refinery-waste FCC catalyst delivers selective plastic-to-fuel conversion while enabling energy-aware regeneration protocols. The framework directly supports scale-up by linking polymer structure, coke quality, and atmosphere-dependent re-activation energetics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bahlouli et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: