Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This Note argues that expanding control person liability under section 20(a) can enhance monitoring and gatekeeping by officers and directors.
Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 allows controlling persons to be held vicariously liable for breaches of the securities laws by parties whom they control. A circuit split has emerged between the Second and the Ninth Circuits concerning whether a plaintiff must show that a control person defendant was a culpable participant in the violative act. This Note argues in favor of the Ninth Circuit standard which holds that plaintiffs should not be required to plead that control person defendants were culpable participants. In doing so, this Note argues that broader exposure for control persons would encourage increased monitoring and gatekeeper behavior among officers and directors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicholas Graves (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: