This article examines social change through the lens of critical race theory and abolitionist approaches, highlighting implications for reform efforts.
Both Critical Race Theory (CRT) and abolitionist theory are grounded in radical critiques of existing systems, sharing a commitment to understanding and fostering structural change. This article brings these traditions into conversation, exploring their combined potential as an analytical framework for understanding reform, social change, and retrenchment. Using the Greater Manchester-based No Police in Schools campaign as a case study, I analyse Manchester City Council's reported decision to remove School-Based Police Officers – a move first celebrated by some as a victory but later found to be fraught with complexity. Applying the CRT concepts of interest convergence and contradiction closure alongside the abolitionist concept of non-reformist reforms, I develop a 'theoretical synergy" that illuminates the limitations of this "victory". This synergy enhances theoretical understanding by clarifying the dynamics behind the shortcomings of reforms, while offering practical insights for campaigns to identify superficial changes and sustain focus on systemic transformation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Remi Joseph–Salisbury (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: