Experiment assesses the influence of preprint status on credibility perceptions in science news, highlighting differences among political affiliations.
This study tested whether the transparent use of preprint sources affects perceived credibility of science news and scientists. In an experiment, U.S. adults read a news report describing COVID-19 research as a “preprint” (with varying level of detail) or as simply a “study.” There were no main effects of disclosing preprint status, but indirect effects emerged. For those who noticed the disclosure, both brief and fuller depictions of a study’s preprint status enhanced credibility of the reporting and the scientists behind the research. However, perceiving the science to be uncertain negatively mediated effects of preprint disclosure on credibility appraisals among Republicans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ratcliff et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: