PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 13, 2025Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing3 citationsOpen Access

Towards reliable prediction of intraoperative hypotension: a cross-center evaluation of deep learning-based and MAP-derived methods

View Full Paper
NCNada ChaariGWGreg WinskiMHMagnus Hallbäck

Key Points

  • AI model shows better performance than MAP threshold in ambiguous intraoperative hypotension cases, enhancing prediction reliability.
  • Cross-validation revealed that models trained with more Gray Zone cases generalized better to datasets with clearer class separation.
  • Standardization of MAP differences reduced dataset-specific bias, demonstrating inflated performance often stems from selection bias.
  • Age influences AI generalization, with models trained on older patients performing better in younger cohorts during predictions.

Abstract

Intraoperative hypotension (IOH) is associated with an increased risk of heart and kidney complications. Although AI tools aim to predict IOH, their real-world reliability is often overstated due to biased data selection. This study introduces a framework to enhance reliability by: (1) including borderline blood pressure cases (65-75 mmHg, the "Gray Zone"), (2) comparing AI model to simple blood pressure threshold, and (3) validating across diverse surgical cohorts, centers and demographics. Using datasets from Karolinska University Hospital (Sweden) and VitalDB (Korea), we found AI model performs better than MAP threshold method in more ambiguous cases. In contrast, when hypotensive and non-hypotensive cases had clearly separated MAP values, both methods performed similarly well. Cross-validation revealed asymmetric generalizability: models trained on datasets containing more borderline (Gray Zone) cases generalized better to datasets with clearer class separation, whereas the reverse struggled. To ensure fair model comparison and reduce dataset-specific bias, we standardized the MAP difference between positive (hypotension) and negative (non-hypotension) samples at the time of prediction. This virtually eliminated the class separation and demonstrated that inflated performance in some datasets can be attributed to selection bias rather than true model generalizability. Age also influenced generalization: Cross-age validation revealed models trained on older patients generalized better to younger cohorts, whereas differences in ASA classification had minimal effect. These findings highlight the need for realistic validation to bridge the gap between AI research and clinical practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chaari et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d44f7b31b076d99fa56cabhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01357-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper