Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis reveals improved tumor targeting with CAR-TNC5 and bispecific antibody in MDA-MB-231 cells, suggesting enhanced antitumor efficacy.
To generate CARCIK cells with enhanced targeting and penetration of solid tumors, we have designed new CAR molecules against tenascin C (TNC), an extracellular matrix and surface molecule, overexpressed in several tumor types. Two different anti-TNC CAR constructs were generated, sharing the anti-TNC scFv domain, fused to the CD3ζ fragment, but differing in co-signaling domains: CAR-TNC4 carrying the 4-1BB and CAR-TNC5 the CD28 and OX40 domains. Both CARs were introduced into cytokine-induced killer cells (CIK) by co-transfection with the sleeping beauty transposase plasmid. CARCIK-TNC cells were cytotoxic against TNC+ targets, proliferated and secreted the IFN-γ and IL-2 cytokines in response to target cell binding, with overall higher efficacy of CARCIK-TNC5 compared to CARCIK-TNC4. To enhance activity and specificity, we also generated a dual construct, carrying a secretable EGFRxCD3 bispecific T cell engager (sBiTE) antibody cDNA. CIK transfected with EGFRxCD3/CAR-TNC5 showed good expression of both molecules and synergistic killing of MDA-MB-231 cells in vitro compared to cells transfected with the single-targeting molecules. Also in vivo, in the subcutaneous TNC+ EGFR+ MDA-MB-231 xenograft model, significantly enhanced control of tumor growth was observed after injection of CIK cells transfected with dual, compared to single constructs. We conclude that CAR-TNC5 combined with EGFRxCD3 can endow CIK cells with different and potentially synergistic functions in vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zaninelli et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: