PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 16, 2025Deleted Journal5 citationsOpen Access

Improved accuracy of functional alignment restoration with robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty

View Full Paper
FMFilippo MiglioriniLSLuise SchäferJSJens Schneider

Key Points

  • Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improved aHKA delta compared to conventional methods, enhancing joint alignment.
  • The robotic group showed significantly better preservation of alignment in both valgus and varus knees with lower deviation angles.
  • Subgroup analyses indicated consistent outcomes across different morphotypes, supporting personalized alignment strategies.
  • Overall, robotic-assisted TKA demonstrated superior accuracy in restoring native joint line orientation, particularly in complex cases.

Abstract

This quasi-randomized controlled trial compared robotic-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in restoring patient-specific coronal alignment according to a functional alignment philosophy. Outcomes included preservation of the anatomical hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA), mechanical axis deviation (MAD), and component positioning. Subgroup analyses assessed consistency in valgus and varus morphotypes. A single-blind parallel group quasi-RCT was conducted at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Germany (2021-2025). Patients underwent TKA following identical perioperative pathways. All procedures used a medial parapatellar approach and Smith & Nephew Legion Genesis II implants. A total of 692 patients were enrolled (346 robotic, 346 freehand). Baseline characteristics were comparable. Postoperative HKA was similar between groups, but the robotic group achieved a significantly smaller aHKA delta (2.58° vs 4.49°, p = 0.002). Robotic-assisted TKA preserved joint line alignment more consistently in valgus (2.63° vs 5.72°, p = 0.03) and varus knees (2.56° vs 4.22°, p = 0.004). The MAD control was improved, while differences n the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) were not significant. Robotic-assisted TKA enhanced accuracy in reproducing native joint line orientation, offering more consistent preservation of joint line obliquity in both valgus and varus morphotypes, thus supporting its role in personalized alignment strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Migliorini et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d44f8331b076d99fa56f9bhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-025-04711-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Improved accuracy of functional alignment restoration with robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty : a quasi-randomized controlled trial2026
  2. 2Real-world accuracy of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty and its impact on expedited recovery2024 · 22 citations
  3. 3Computed Tomography-Based Analysis of Implant Positioning after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Conventional and Robotic Arm-Assisted Procedures2025 · 2 citations
  4. 4Robotic‐assisted total knee arthroplasty is not associated with improved accuracy in implant position and alignment compared to conventional instrumentation in the execution of a preoperative digital plan2024 · 5 citations
  5. 5Morphotype analysis and intraoperative range of motion in robotic-assisted functional alignment total knee arthroplasty2026