PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 16, 2025Vaccine6 citationsOpen Access

Acceptance of chikungunya vaccination: a rapid survey in Reunion island during an epidemic.

View Full Paper
RMR. ManaquinADAnissa DesmoulinLNLiêm Binh Luong Nguyen

Key Points

  • Acceptability of the chikungunya vaccine was highest at 60.5% in a full-reimbursement scenario, indicating financial factors are crucial.
  • Healthcare workers demonstrated higher acceptance levels compared to the general population, suggesting professional influence on vaccine uptake.
  • In scenarios without full reimbursement, the acceptability dropped significantly to 35.5% and 20.1%, highlighting the importance of cost.
  • No significant association was found between comorbidities and vaccination acceptance, pointing to other influencing factors like gender.

Abstract

During the 2025 chikungunya outbreak in Réunion Island, two vaccines-IXCHIQ (live-attenuated) and VIMKUNYA (virus-like particle)-received European Union authorization; a local campaign began in April 2025 and was temporarily adjusted for older adults after safety concerns. We assessed vaccine acceptability at the outbreak onset among residents, focusing on people with comorbidities. In January 2025, a cross-sectional web survey yielded 918 complete responses (mean age 44.5 years; 13.1 % prior chikungunya; 53.4 % healthcare workers). Acceptability was highest in the hypothetical full-reimbursement scenario (60.5 %) and was lower among women and those with prior chikungunya; healthcare workers were more likely to accept vaccination. In the hypothetical clinical-trial and self-financed scenarios, acceptability declined to 35.5 % and 20.1 %, respectively, with the same pattern of predictors. Comorbidities showed no significant association. Financing and implementation context, together with gender differences, were key drivers of uptake at the beginning of 2025 outbreak.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Manaquin et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d44f8331b076d99fa57129https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127720
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper