PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 16, 2025Expert Review of Medical Devices14 citations

Software as medical devices: requirements and regulatory landscape in the United States

View Full Paper
SSShivani A. ShahPTPriyanka ThakorASAakash Shah

Key Points

  • The incorporation of software as medical devices enhances diagnostics and patient care, but also presents regulatory challenges.
  • The total product lifecycle framework is critical for overseeing the performance and risks associated with AI/ML in software as medical devices.
  • Existing regulatory approaches must evolve to maintain patient safety and ensure equitable access to innovative healthcare technologies.
  • Challenges such as algorithmic bias and transparency need addressing to foster public trust in software as medical devices.

Abstract

The integration of software into medical devices has profoundly transformed the healthcare landscape, enabling more precise diagnostics, personalized treatment plans, and remote patient monitoring. The rapid pace of software development - especially with emerging technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) - demands specialized regulatory frameworks to ensure patient safety, clinical effectiveness, and product reliability. Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) refers to software intended for medical purposes that operates independently of a physical medical device. This article traces the historical development of regulatory approaches, deconstructs existing frameworks, analyzes key challenges and influencing factors, presents case studies, and anticipates future trends. A narrative literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, FDA.gov, EUR-Lex and IMDRF.org, covering materials published between January 2013 and May 2025. The Total Product Lifecycle (TPLC) framework is essential for managing the evolving performance and risks associated with AI/ML-based SaMD. AI/ML-powered SaMD is not merely transforming healthcare delivery, it is challenging and redefining the foundational assumptions of medical regulation. The regulatory systems must evolve ensuring transparency, maintaining public trust, addressing algorithmic bias, and promoting equitable access to the benefits of these advanced technologies. Innovation must be guided by a framework rooted in safety, integrity, and equity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shah et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d44f8331b076d99fa57204https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2025.2561918
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper