The combination of anti-programmed cell death-1 antibody with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapy and chemotherapy is widely used in the United States and Europe for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Molecular profiles that predict the efficacy of this dual-target therapy are unclear. To explore the clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a predictive marker of the efficacy of standard chemotherapy plus HER2 and programmed death-ligand 1 dual-targeted therapy in patients with HER2-positive AGC. Collaborative study of the Ni-High phase Ib clinical trial. A total of 21 patients with tissue-confirmed HER2-positive AGC who received chemotherapy with dual-targeted therapy (capecitabine/S-1, oxaliplatin, trastuzumab, and nivolumab) in a phase Ib clinical trial (UMIN000034222) were enrolled. The association of genomic profiles in plasma ctDNA with tissue HER2 amplification status and their correlation with clinical outcomes was investigated. Among the 21 patients studied, 20 (95.2%) showed somatic alterations in ctDNA. ERBB2 amplifications and single-nucleotide variants (SNVs)/indels were found in 12 (57.1%) and 3 (14.3%) patients, respectively. Significant associations between maximum mutant allele frequency (mMAF) and tumor size and between ctDNA and tissue ERBB2 copy numbers were found. Patients without ERBB2 SNV/indels showed longer median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than those with these alterations. Patients with focal ERBB2 amplification in ctDNA showed better outcomes than those with aneuploidy (median PFS: 20.8 vs 8.4 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.08; median OS: NA vs 14.8 months, HR = 0.077). Lower mMAF at cycle 2 was associated with a better response to chemotherapy with dual-targeted therapy. ERBB2 genetic status and mMAF changes in ctDNA may, respectively, predict and reflect the efficacy of chemotherapy with dual-targeted therapy in HER2-positive AGC. UMIN000034222.
Osumi et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: