PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 16, 2025Buildings5 citationsOpen Access

A Machine Learning Framework for Regional Damage Assessment Using Multi-Station Seismic Parameters: Insights from the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes

View Full Paper
ÖNÖmer Faruk NemutluSÖSalih Taha Alperen ÖzçelikMFMohamed Freeshah

Key Points

  • The machine learning framework identifies damage patterns, achieving up to 79.65% accuracy in classifications.
  • Ensemble models like random forest show significant potential, with the highest F1-score at 0.891 for severely damaged structures.
  • Multi-station seismic data enhances damage assessment by integrating parameters from six seismic stations for each building.
  • Findings establish a data-driven model for future seismic risk assessments and inform emergency decision-making.

Abstract

The twin earthquakes that struck Kahramanmaraş in 2023 (Mw 7.7 and Mw 7.6) caused widespread structural destruction across southeastern Türkiye, underscoring the need for more refined approaches to seismic damage assessment. In this study, a large-scale machine learning (ML) analysis is conducted to identify and classify damage patterns among 304,299 buildings across 11 cities. Ten ML algorithms are implemented, and their performance in the multiclass classification of damage severity is comparatively evaluated (collapsed, urgent demolition, moderately damaged, and severely damaged). Unlike conventional methods that rely on single-station data, the proposed approach integrates ground motion parameters from the six seismic stations closest to each building. These parameters include peak ground acceleration, several distance measures (Joyner–Boore, rupture, and epicentral distances), and site condition indicators such as mean shear wave velocity in the upper 30 m and soil classification, yielding 60 engineered features per building. The analysis reveals that ensemble learning models, particularly the random forest and a voting ensemble, achieve the highest classification accuracies (79.65% and 79.62%, respectively). Moreover, classification performance varies across damage categories: severely damaged structures exhibit the highest F1-score (0.891), whereas collapsed buildings exhibit lower accuracy (F1-score: 0.408). These findings offer practical value for post-earthquake emergency operations. Furthermore, the methodology establishes a precedent for future seismic risk assessments and supports data-driven decision-making.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nemutlu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4506b31b076d99fa5797dhttps://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15183326
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper