Qualitative research reveals growing engagement of Muslim women in Pattani's public life, highlighting gender equality improvements.
Purpose: This study aims to explore emerging trends in Muslim women’s leadership, identify structural and cultural barriers and enablers, and propose context-sensitive strategies to enhance their leadership potential in Pattani Province, Thailand. Methodology: A qualitative research design was employed, involving document analysis and in-depth interviews with 15 key informants from diverse community and organizational backgrounds. Main Findings: The findings reveal a promising transformation: Muslim women are increasingly engaging in public life, supported by growing social acceptance, expanding grassroots networks, and shifting attitudes particularly among the younger generation. These dynamics suggest a gradual erosion of long-standing barriers. Nevertheless, persistent challenges such as patriarchal norms and the dual burden of domestic responsibilities—continue to constrain their full participation in leadership roles. Application: The study proposes a multi-level approach to strengthen women’s leadership: individual-level capacity building through culturally grounded leadership training; community-based initiatives that foster peer support networks and safe spaces for expression; and policy-level reforms to institutionalize support via dedicated leadership centers and gender-responsive budgeting. These recommendations are designed to amplify the voices and agency of Muslim women as key agents of change in Pattani’s peacebuilding and development processes. Novelty/Originality: This qualitative study offers a novel examination of Muslim women’s leadership in Pattani Province a conflict-affected region shaped by cultural conservatism and gendered constraints. Unlike prior research focused on security or religious discourse, this study centers on women’s lived experiences and the socio-cultural shifts enabling their participation in governance, contributing a stakeholder-centered perspective to the literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pavin Chinachoti (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: