Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental analysis demonstrates turbulence behavior in boundary layers with varying pressure gradients, highlighting differences between smooth and rough walls.
Sink flow boundary layers on smooth and rough walls were studied experimentally. In all cases a turbulent, zero-pressure-gradient boundary layer was subject to acceleration with K = 3.2 × 10 –6 , which suppressed the turbulence in the outer region and produced conditions similar to those in turbulent sink flow cases with lower K . In the smooth-wall case, after the momentum thickness Reynolds number had dropped to about 600, the near-wall turbulence then dropped, resulting in relaminarisation. In the rough-wall cases, the near-wall turbulence was sustained in spite of the strong favourable pressure gradient, and relaminarisation did not occur. A temporary equilibrium appears to occur that is similar to that seen with lower K , in spite of the ratio of the boundary-layer thickness to the roughness height dropping to less than 5. Mean velocity and Reynolds stress profiles, quadrant analysis and turbulence spectra are used to show the development of the boundary layer in response to the pressure gradient and the differences between the rough- and smooth-wall cases. This is believed to be the first study to consider the spatial evolution of constant- K rough-wall boundary layers with K large enough to cause relaminarisation in the smooth-wall case.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Volino et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: