This research demonstrates the impact of varying soil diffusivity and hydraulic conductivity models, indicating improved accuracy in simulations of infiltration.
The one‐dimensional Richards equation has been widely employed to model water flow in porous media, but the effect of averaging soil diffusivity/hydraulic conductivity on the computed solutions has received comparatively less attention than the numerical approaches to solve the equation. The use of non‐arithmetic (harmonic and geometric) averaging of diffusivity in finite volume simulations of the Richards equation is known to produce numerical artifacts that include the lagging of the wetting front in time and even “locked” fronts with no flow, depending on the type of soil and the constitutive relation. In this work, we propose a new and simple approach to define the interfacial diffusivity or hydraulic conductivity based on “modified” non‐arithmetic averages that mitigates the spurious artifacts at minimal computational cost. Numerical studies with unsaturated soils using different soil diffusivity models (for horizontal infiltration) and different hydraulic conductivity models (for vertical infiltration) conclusively demonstrate that the ‐harmonic and ‐geometric averages defined in this work lead to physically consistent solutions of the Richards equation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
K et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: