This research reveals lumbar spine mechanics during power snatch in high-intensity functional training athletes, suggesting protective adaptations.
This study aimed to determine if lumbar spine joint mechanics altered during a power snatch protocol. Eighteen high-intensity functional training (HIFT) athletes performed two countermovement jumps (CMJ) before and after a 30-repetition power snatch protocol at 70% of one repetition maximum. Three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were collected simultaneously during the power snatch protocol. Average data from five events of the second and third, and twenty-ninth and thirtieth power snatches were compared. At the end of the power snatch protocol, there was a significant decrease in CMJ height (5.4 cm). The power snatch protocol showed a significant decrease in T12-L1 intervertebral joint extension angle (5.3°, p = 0.04; g = 0.65) at the recovery event. Velocity significantly (p = 0.03–0.05), moderately (g = 0.52–0.75) increased for the T12-L1 left rotation (23 °.s −1 ) and L5-S1 right rotation (23.9 °.s −1 ) at the end of the second pull event, whereas L5-S1 right lateral flexion velocity (17.8 °.s −1 ) decreased at the catch event. Finally, the L5-S1 flexor moment (−4.06 Nm) significantly changed to an extensor moment (0.46 Nm) at the transition event ( p = 0.018, g = 0.75). These findings suggest that substantial neuromuscular impairment induced by high-intensity repeated power snatches does not necessarily result in a decline of lumbar spine lifting mechanics, rather athletes may elicit a protective ‘stiffening’ of the spinal region.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pilgrim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: