PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 16, 2025Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar3 citationsOpen Access

Educational innovation in virtual environments: a systematic review of methodological strategies post-covid-19 (2020–2025)

View Full Paper
RMRosario Elizabeth Jiménez Mendieta

Key Points

  • Gamification and project-based learning enhance student motivation and academic achievement, revealing significant benefits.
  • Students face technical difficulties and access challenges, while instructors emphasize the need for professional development.
  • A mixed-methods approach incorporated surveys and interviews from students and instructors across Ecuador to gather diverse insights.
  • Integrating active methodologies in hybrid learning can improve education quality if supported by institutional policies and infrastructure.

Abstract

This study provides a systematic and detailed review of educational innovation in virtual learning environments, emphasizing the use of active methodologies during the post-COVID-19 period (2020–2025). Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research combines a qualitative documentary review guided by PRISMA 2020 with empirical data collection through surveys and semi-structured interviews involving students and university instructors in Ecuador. Searches were conducted in major databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, SciELO, Redalyc, and Google Scholar, to locate empirical and theoretical studies related to higher education, virtual teaching, and active learning strategies. Findings show that gamification, flipped classrooms, project-based learning, and collaborative learning effectively enhance student motivation, engagement, autonomy, and academic achievement. Key challenges remain, such as the digital divide, limited teacher training, insufficient institutional support, and sustainability concerns for implementing innovative pedagogies. Comparisons of student and teacher perspectives reveal alignment regarding the benefits of active methodologies but differences in perceived obstacles: students emphasize technical and access difficulties, whereas instructors focus on professional development and institutional support gaps. The study concludes that context-sensitive integration of active methodologies in hybrid learning environments can substantially improve higher education quality in Ecuador, provided strong institutional policies, ongoing professional development, and inclusive digital infrastructures are implemented. Implications for curriculum design, policy-making, and future research are also discussed, highlighting the need for longitudinal and comparative studies that include both student and teacher perspectives to develop sustainable, culturally appropriate hybrid learning models.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rosario Elizabeth Jiménez Mendieta (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4539c31b076d99fa596cbhttps://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v9i4.19372
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Active methodologies and virtual platforms in higher education: a comparative qualitative study of student perceptions in Peru and Chile2026
  2. 2Teaching Strategies and Virtual Campus Uses in Higher Education after the COVID-19 Digital Transformation2025
  3. 3Education in Transition: Adapting and Thriving in a Post-COVID World2024 · 18 citations
  4. 4Integrating technologies, active methodologies, and curriculum: promoting interactivity in the teaching-learning process2024
  5. 5In-person and Hybrid Learning in the Training of Professionals in Higher Education. An ict-centric Approach2024 · 3 citations