PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 16, 2025Animals3 citationsOpen Access

The Spatiotemporal Distribution Patterns and Coexistence Mechanisms of Two Musk Deer Species in Mt. Gongga, Sichuan Province, China

View Full Paper
NYNan YangYDYuan-Hao DuMLMingyang Liu

Key Points

  • Temporal niche differentiation is a key coexistence strategy for the musky deer species.
  • MaxEnt modeling and niche overlap analysis revealed shared elevational ranges between the two species.
  • M. berezovskii exhibited nocturnal behavior while M. chrysogaster was primarily diurnal.
  • Climate-driven forest line shifts may influence habitat preferences and distribution patterns.

Abstract

Elucidating the spatiotemporal distribution patterns of closely related sympatric species is essential for understanding niche partitioning dynamics. The forest musk deer (Moschus berezovskii) and alpine musk deer (Moschus chrysogaster) extensively co-occur across the southeastern Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, yet their coexistence mechanisms remain unclear. Based on a decade-long dataset (2012–2021) collected from 493 infrared cameras deployed in Gongga Mountain National Nature Reserve, this study integrated MaxEnt modeling, kernel density estimation, and niche overlap analysis to investigate their spatiotemporal distribution patterns. Spatially, the two species exhibited strong geographic consistency and similar ecological preferences for climate and vegetation factors. Both species shared an elevational range (2870–4572 m ASL) with no clear segregation, likely due to climate-driven forest line shifts. In contrast, temporal partitioning was pronounced: M. berezovskii was mostly nocturnal, while M. chrysogaster was primarily diurnal, with both showing seasonal activity adjustments. These findings highlight temporal niche differentiation as a key coexistence strategy and emphasize the necessity of incorporating geographic variation in habitat adaptation into conservation frameworks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d453a431b076d99fa59af7https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15182701
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Forage availability, supplementary feed and ungulate density: Associations with ungulate damage in pine production forests2022 · 38 citations
  2. 2Conservation status and causes of decline of musk deer ( Moschus spp.) in China2002 · 191 citations
  3. 3The coexistence of species La coexistencia de especies2000 · 41 citations
  4. 4Modeling Landscape Use for Ungulates: Forgotten Tenets of Ecology, Management, and Inference2020 · 30 citations
  5. 5Activity of the Russian desman Desmana moschata (Talpidae, Insectivora) in its burrow2020 · 14 citations