Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study reveals significant gaps in orofacial pain management among dentists in Chennai, suggesting a need for improved education.
Background: Orofacial pain is pain confined to the face and mouth. It is denoted by pain or discomfort in various parts of the face, mouth, or jaw, affecting day-to-day life activities. Based on etiology, orofacial pain is graded into seven categories. Aim: This descriptive, quantitative cross-sectional study aimed to assess the awareness levels of general dentists, dental trainees, and specialists in Chennai regarding chronic orofacial pain and its management. Materials and Methods: The current study was conducted among a total population of 120 general dentists, trainees, and specialty dentists such as periodontists, oral surgeons, oral medicine specialists, and radiologists practicing in and around the regions of Chennai. The competency was assessed using a validated questionnaire containing 23 items under 4 sections. Hundred percent response was obtained, and the results were evaluated using SPSS software version 24. Results: Among the total sample size of 120 dentists, the mean ± standard deviation knowledge score was 9.22 ± 2.36 (maximum = 15). The knowledge assessment scores were assessed, and the level of confidence in handling orofacial pain (OFP) was found to be 48.3%. The study revealed that only 10.8% of the dentists exhibited a high level of knowledge, 54.2% showed a moderate understanding, and 35% had limited knowledge regarding OFP. In terms of topic-specific performance, correct responses were recorded for 47.8% of etiology-related questions, 55.2% for clinical presentation, and 48.2% for management strategies. Conclusion: The result of the current study highlights the gaps in the dental curriculum and emphasizes the scope for further research and continued dental education on OFP at the undergraduate and postgraduate levels, and the need for a revamped educational framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vikashini et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: