PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 16, 2025Journal of Clinical Medicine3 citationsOpen Access

Oral Microbiome Analysis and Caries Risk Classification Using the Caries Management by Risk Assessment System in Pre-Orthodontic Patients

View Full Paper
IKIsamu KadoRKRyo KunimatsuYKYukiko Koizumi

Key Points

  • Participants were grouped into four CAMBRA classifications, with many in the High risk group, indicating severe risks.
  • The Extreme risk group had the worst oral hygiene, with the highest DMF teeth and white spot lesions observed.
  • Saliva tests revealed significant deficiencies in secretion volume and buffering capacity in the Extreme risk group.
  • 16S metagenomic analysis found Fusobacterium prevalent in the Low risk group while Actinomyces dominated the Extreme group.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to classify pre-orthodontic patients using the Caries Management by Risk Assessment (CAMBRA) system and clarify their oral characteristics and microbiome. Methods: At the Department of Orthodontics, Hiroshima University Hospital, 68 patients were included in this study. Clinical parameters, such as plaque control record, DMF index, and number of white spot lesions (WSLs), were obtained. Medical interviews and oral examinations were conducted according to the CAMBRA system, and participants were classified into four risk groups (Low, Moderate, High, and Extreme). The supragingival plaques and stimulated saliva were collected. A saliva test was performed to measure the saliva secretion volume, pH, buffering capacity, and bacterial culture. Microbial DNA was extracted from the stimulated saliva and plaque samples, and 16S rRNA metagenomic analysis was performed. For statistical analysis, the Kruskal–Wallis test was used. Results: Participants were classified into four CAMBRA risk groups, with many classified as the High group. The number of DMF teeth and WSLs were the highest in the Extreme group, which tended to have the worst oral hygiene habits. The saliva test results revealed that the Extreme group had the worst saliva secretion volume, buffering capacity, and Streptococcus mutans score, with statistically significant differences. Bacterial 16S metagenomic sequencing revealed that the genus Fusobacterium had the highest relative abundance in the saliva samples of the Low group, whereas the genus Actinomyces had the highest relative abundance in the Extreme group. Conclusions: In this single-center, cross-sectional study, CAMBRA risk classification accurately reflected the oral condition of pre-orthodontic patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kado et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d454bb31b076d99fa59e60https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186464
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper