This analysis reveals how authority shapes player interactions, indicating its role in legitimizing gamesplaining and rule lawyering.
This paper investigates how a dominant player is socially assigned authority that legitimizes behaviours of gamesplaining and rule lawyering: it delves into how authority is distributed and validated between players and examines how social norms and implicit consent play a part in both the validation of authority and the normalization of exercises of power. The research introduces a synthesized framework derived from theoretical analysis of the social process of assigning and consolidating “expert authority” (Haugaard 2018 & 2021) to the dominant player in the context of playing tabletop role-playing games.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Julie Tremblay (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: