This paper demonstrates an effective strategy to manage surge protective devices in energy storage systems, highlighting voltage protection levels.
This paper deals with an optimal operation method for surge protective devices (SPDs) to calculate the maximum continuous operating voltage (UC) and the voltage protection level (UP) by considering the sum of the voltage protection level and the dielectric continuous voltage limit of surge protective devices in order to effectively protect energy storage system (ESS) from switching and lightning surges. This paper also implements a test device for SPDs in ESSs based on the concept of a lightning electromagnetic surge protection measurement system (LPMS) by combining an SPD coordinated with spatial shielding with an ESS configuration. Here, the test device for the SPD in the ESS is composed of a power distribution unit (PDU), uninterruptible power supply (UPS), and a lightning electromagnetic pulse (LEMP) protection device, which combines two units of SPDs and disconnection switches (DSs) connected in parallel with two units of main circuit breakers (MCBs) and noise cut transformers (NCTs) connected in series. From the test results based on the proposed optimal operation method and test device, it is clear that the residual voltage with a third-class combination waveform can be kept within 1.5 kV of the surge voltage limit in all test scenarios, and it is confirmed that the proposed test device for SPDs can protect ESSs from switching and lightning surges. Therefore, it is confirmed that the SPD tested using the proposed method can effectively reduce switching and lightning surges, while the existing SPDs installed in ESS sites cannot protect ESSs from such surges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: