Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This comparative analysis assesses pathfinding algorithms ACO and A for dynamic and static environments, highlighting performance differences.
Pathfinding is a critical problem in robotics, artificial intelligence, and network optimization. This paper presents a comparative evaluation of three popular algorithms: Ant Colony Optimization (ACO), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and A* search. Implemented in MATLAB, the study analyzes their performance in terms of path length, execution time, convergence behavior, and adaptability under both static and dynamic grid environments. Results indicate that A* consistently provides the shortest paths with minimal computation time, ACO demonstrates robustness in dynamic environments, and PSO offers a balance between accuracy and efficiency. The findings contribute to the selection of suitable algorithms for real-world applications in robotics, multi-agent systems, and intelligent navigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davu Manikanta (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: