⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

January 1, 2025ArchéoSciences

Geophysical methods, unmarked graves, and the effects of seasonal rainfall on their detection

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

Geophysical methods effectively detect unmarked graves, with GPR and ERT showing different results based on conditions.
GPR demonstrated improved detection rates compared to ERT in detecting unmarked burials, especially after seasonal rainfall.
Analysis utilized geophysical data from South Australia, focusing on the soil characteristics affecting detection efficacy.
Results may inform future archaeological practices and enhance methods for locating unmarked graves in various terrains.

Implication

Observational analysis compares GPR and ERT techniques in detecting unmarked graves, highlighting rainfall impacts.

Abstract

Understanding the interactions of GPR, ERT and the soils of South Australia, Comparison of methods in detecting unmarked burials

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Andrew Frost (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d454d131b076d99fa5a80e https://doi.org/10.4000/14nrs

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Comparison of Time-Lapse Ground-Penetrating Radar and Electrical Resistivity Tomography Surveys for Detecting Pig (Sus spp.) Cadaver Graves in an Australian Environment2024 · 7 citations
2Assessing Unmarked Graves Using Ground-penetrating Radar at Ayn Gharandal Archaeological Site, JordanOriginal Research · 2026
3The ghostly features of Odberg: studying post-depositional changes in GPR data2025
4Ground penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography surveys with a subsequent intrusive investigation in search for the missing Beaumont children in Adelaide, South Australia2024 · 7 citations
5The challenges of signal interpretation of burials in ground‐penetrating radarReview · 2023 · 16 citations

More related papers

Mapping Unmarked Graves Using a Ground‐Penetrating Radar (GPR): A Case Study From the New Hope Cemetery in Uniontown, Alabama2026
Influence of the sand-clay ratio of the burial material of forensic targets on ground-penetrating radar (GPR) responses–comparison of dry and rainy season data2024
Comparison of GPR signals over simulated clandestine graves with domestic pigs (<i>Sus Scrofa domesticus</i>) and human remains2024

More from ArchéoSciences

Urbes Revelantur. New Remote and Proximal Sensing investigations in the abandoned city of Suasa (Marche, Italy)Wed,
Geophysical mapping of coastal and shallow submerged Bronze Age settlements: The case of Palaikastro, Eastern Crete GreeceWed,