Pushing too far? Use of 5 non-destructive methods for studying Roman towns: example of Elusa (Eauze, France)

Q: What type of study is this?

This is a Experimental Study study.

Michel Dabas; Laurent Callegarin; Lieven Verdonck; Armand Grout; G. Sénéchal; D. Rousset; Benoît Pacé

doi:10.4000/14nr4

January 1, 2025ArchéoSciences

Pushing too far? Use of 5 non-destructive methods for studying Roman towns: example of Elusa (Eauze, France)

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

The study successfully compares five non-destructive methods applied to the Roman town of Elusa.
Using aerial, resistivity, magnetometry, and multi-channel GPR, diverse archaeological insights were gained.
Public impact was assessed alongside technical evaluations, highlighting the value of these methods.
Results emphasize how non-invasive techniques can provide essential data on historical sites.

Implication

Analysis compares five non-destructive methods for studying a Roman town, indicating diverse insights and public impact.

Abstract

Cartography of a Roman town with 5 non-destructive methods: aerial, resistivity, magnetometry, two multi-channel GPR. Comparison of results. Public impact

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Dabas et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d454d131b076d99fa5a815 https://doi.org/10.4000/14nr4

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Pushing too far? Use of 5 non-destructive methods for studying Roman towns: example of Elusa (Eauze, France)

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Pushing too far? Use of 5 non-destructive methods for studying Roman towns: example of Elusa (Eauze, France)

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading