Bibliometric analysis identifies trends in soil erosion and radionuclide tracing, suggesting interdisciplinary approaches for sustainable land management.
Radionuclide tracer technology, as a state-of-the-art tool for quantifying and monitoring soil erosion processes, has attracted much attention in global sustainable land management research in recent years. However, existing studies are fragmented in methodological applications, lack systematic knowledge integration and interdisciplinary perspectives, and lack global research trends and dynamic evolution of key themes. This study integrates Bibliometrix, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace to conduct bibliometric and knowledge mapping analysis of 1692 documents (2000–2023) in the Web of Science Core Collection, focusing on the overall developmental trends, thematic evolution, and progress of convergence and innovation. The main findings of the study are as follows: (1) China, the United States, and the United Kingdom are in a “three-legged race” at the national level, with China focusing on technological application innovation, the United States on theoretical breakthroughs, and the United Kingdom contributing significantly to methodological research; (2) “soil erosion” and “137Cs” continue to be the core themes, while “climate change” and “human impact” on soil erosion and its reflection in radionuclide tracing became the focus of attention; and (3) multi-scale radionuclide tracing (watershed, slope), multi-method synergy (radionuclide tracing combined with RS, GIS, AI), and the integration of advanced measurement and control technologies (PGS, ARS) have become cutting-edge trends in soil erosion monitoring and control. This study provides three prospective research directions—the construction of a global soil erosion database, the policy transformation mechanism of the SDG interface, and the iterative optimization of multi-radionuclide tracer technology, which will provide scientific guidance for the realization of the sustainable management of soil erosion and the goal of zero growth of land degradation globally.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: