Cross-sectional survey reveals high awareness (86.6%) of ovum freezing among cancer patients, suggesting cultural influences on acceptance.
Background: Ovum freezing as a method of fertility preservation has become an important alternative to women diagnosed with cancer, especially those about to undergo fertility-damaging cancer treatments. Cultural, religious, and informational influences on awareness and attitudes to this procedure may exist in such conservative societies as Saudi Arabia. Objective: To evaluate knowledge, opinions, and main issues related to fertility preservation by ovum freezing amid adult females in the Madinah area of Saudi Arabia particularly with references to cancer-related fertility hazards. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 374 female participants was done through structured questionnaire measurement that covered demographic information, awareness rates, opinion of egg freezing, its acceptability in different medical situations, and particular concerns. Statistical methods embraced descriptive statistics, and chi-square tests of association were used to explore relationships between concerns and demographic variables. Results: The study found a high rate of awareness (86.6%) regarding egg freezing, with participants being exposed to this procedure mostly via media and personal circles. Nonetheless, 12.8 percent thought about having the procedure done. Safety, cost, religious and ethical concerns, as well as lack of knowledge of the procedure were all a matter of concern. Medically justified cases were widely acceptable particularly in cancer patients. The concerns were found to be statistically significant more among the single women or women who did not have children. Conclusion: Although the awareness is high the acceptance and intention to utilize ovum freezing is low as the informational, ethical and emotional issues surrounding it are considerable. Culturally sensitive counseling and targeted educational interventions are needed to enhance informed decision-making about fertility preservation in Saudi Arabia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kain et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: