Quasi-experimental study improved phonological awareness in grade 2 students using digital applications, suggesting effective teaching enhancements.
This study examined the effectiveness of digital learning applications in enhancing the phonological awareness of Grade 2 students at Cateel Central Elementary School during the 2024–2025 school year. Phonological awareness—comprising phoneme awareness, syllable segmentation, onset-rime awareness, and word awareness—is a critical foundation for early reading and literacy development. Utilizing a quasi-experimental design, the researchers divided 60 Grade 2 students into two equal groups: one received traditional phonics instruction (the control group). In contrast, the other received a phonics instruction approach that incorporated technology (the experimental group). At the same time, the other used the ABCMouse digital learning app (the experimental group). A validated 16-item rubric was used for both pre-test and post-test assessments. Results showed no significant difference in the pre-test scores between the two groups, confirming a comparable baseline. However, post-test analysis revealed a statistically significant improvement in the experimental group (mean = 12.25) compared to the control group (mean = 11.22), with a computed p-value of 0.019. The effect size, measured using Cohen's d (1.577), indicated a medium effect of the digital intervention. These findings align with Mayer's Multimedia Learning Theory, which emphasizes dual-channel processing, limited cognitive capacity, and the importance of active learning. The study concludes that digital learning apps, such as ABCMouse, are effective in improving phonological awareness, particularly in resource-limited settings. It recommends integrating such technology-based interventions into early literacy instruction to promote more engaging, differentiated, and effective learning experiences for young learners.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reyes et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: