Motivation: For 31P-MRSI, it hard to keep a good balance between the scan time, scan resolution and accurate qualification of different metabolites at 3T. Goal(s): To get a high-resolution 31P-MRSI protocol with reasonable scan time. Also evaluate the influence of NSAs on different metabolites. Approach: Five healthy volunteers underwent high-resolution 31P scanning with 8 number of signal averages. The Cramer-Rao Lower Bounds (CRLBs) for different NSAs were estimated for different metabolites. Results: Recommended NSAs for different Metabolites of concern could be obtained with CRLB. In our case, NSA of 2 may be suitable for most of the metabolites with a reasonable scan time. Impact: This study optimized a high-resolution neuro 31P protocol via CRLB simulation. Suggested NSA numbers were provided for different metabolites and different brain regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: