Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This approach combines deep learning and non-linear least squares for faster T1ρ mapping in the knee joint, indicating improved fitting speed.
Motivation: Non-linear least squares (NLS)-based T1$ρ$ fitting converges slowly and sensitive to initial guesses. Deep learning-based methods offer efficient alternatives, but suffer from overfitting and generalization problems. Goal(s): To overcome the limitations of NLS and DL, we introduce HDNLS, which uses DL-based T1ρ fitting as an initial guess for NLS. Approach: The optimal number of NLS iterations is determined by analyzing the trade-off between precision and fitting time. Finally, four HDNLS variants are suggested: Ultrafast-HDNLS, Superfast-HDNLS, HDNLS, and Relaxed-HDNLS. Results: HDNLS exhibits similar behavior to NLS and Regularized NLS (RNLS) with a minimum of 13-times increase in fitting speed. Impact: Our results indicate that HDNLS is faster and exhibits similar behavior to NLS for whole knee joint T1$ρ$ mapping than NLS. Thus, HDNLS is an alternative to replace NLS and RNLS for T1$$ρ$ mapping when computational time is an issue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: