Comparison of ASL-CMR and TTDE reveals higher sensitivity for detecting coronary microvascular dysfunction in diabetic mice, highlighting diagnostic performance.
Motivation: Diagnosis of CMD in diabetes is clinically important. While both TTDE and ASL-CMR hold promise for non-invasive CMD detection, their diagnostic efficacy in different types of diabetes has not been systematically evaluated. Goal(s): Comparing the diagnostic performance of ASL-CMR versus TTDE in detecting CMD in different types of diabetes. Approach: ASL-CMR and TTDE were performed on type 1 and type 2 diabetic mouse models at rest and stress states. The derived imaging markers were correlated with histological findings for validation. Results: ASL-CMR demonstrated higher sensitivity in detecting CMD, showing stronger correlation with histopathological changes (R²=0.81) compared to TTDE (R²=0.67). Impact: ASL-CMR enables early detection and quantitative assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in diabetes as validated against histology, which may server as a useful tool for monitoring CMD progression and evaluating therapeutic interventions without contrast agents or radiation exposure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: