Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative analysis shows that segmentation errors bias iron measurements in MS, highlighting the importance of precise segmentation methods.
Motivation: Studies have proposed iron content as an atrophy-independent metric in MS to study iron dyshomeostatis, however, existing T1-based segmentation tools like FSL FIRST may introduce systematic errors, potentially biasing group differences. Goal(s): To evaluate the effect of segmentation choice on DGM iron content measurements in MS where atrophy is common. Approach: We compared FSL FIRST and an enhanced bi-parametric joint label fusion (B-JLF) segmentation method in 109 people with MS and 55 healthy controls. Results: FIRST's segmentation errors introduced a bias that affected the group differences in iron content, whereas B-JLF yielding more reliable results. Impact: This study highlights that segmentation method choice impacts clinical findings on iron pathology in MS, underscoring the importance of accurate segmentation for unbiased interpretation of neuroimaging data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: