Analysis reveals spatial specificity trade-offs due to motion in group independent component analysis networks.
Motivation: Resting-state network quality is a trade-off involving the amount of data used (data quantity) to form the network and confounds such as motion, yet these trade-offs remain largely unexplored. Goal(s): Establish the relationship between motion and group network spatial specificity across varying data quantities. Approach: We analyzed group resting-state networks with differing levels of motion contamination, modelled the relationship and identified data quantities required for specific spatial specificity levels. Results: The relationship between quantity of data and motion level changes based on the desired spatial specificity. We present a methodology to produce calibration curves that reveal this relationship. Impact: This contribution informs researchers who want to perform power calculations or group-level analyses following dual regression of network components with a methodology to approximate the quantity of data necessary to achieve quality results given an estimate of the motion levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laxer et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: