Analysis compares curl operator and gradient-based methods for stiffness estimation, suggesting implications for MRE processing.
Motivation: To improve the reliability of MRE in stiffness estimation. Goal(s): To assess how curl and gradient-based methods compare in estimating stiffness and preserving biological contrasts in MRE. Approach: Direct inversion (DI) and neural network inversion (NNI) methods were evaluated on simulated and in vivo data using both curl and gradient displacement field as input features. Results: Curl operator-based stiffness estimates were softer, consistent with more complete removal of the longitudinal wave. However, both curl-based and gradient-based methods captured biologically relevant contrasts. Impact: The findings provide insights for selecting MRE processing methods, indicating that while curl-based methods improve shear wave isolation, gradient-based approaches may serve as better training data for capturing stiffness variations in structurally complex, inhomogeneous tissues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pavuluri et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: