Assessment reveals distinct GIRF differences in various high-performance gradient systems, suggesting further investigation into artifacts.
Motivation: The imperfections of pre-clinical high-performance gradient systems are largely unknown, especially at ultra-high field strength. Goal(s): To gain an understanding of the gradient system response of such hardware at 9.4T. Approach: We measure the gradient impulse response function (GIRF) of three high-performance gradient systems: two with identical specifications (660 mT/m), but mounted in different scanners, and one small-diameter insert, with a substantially higher maximum amplitude of 1450 mT/m. Results: The GIRF of the small-diameter insert stands out distinctly when comparing all three systems. The two differently mounted, but otherwise identical systems only show subtle differences in their GIRFs. Impact: We measure and compare the impulse response of different high-performance gradient systems at 9.4T. This marks the first step towards assessing and correcting for the imperfections and resulting artifacts of such hardware.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goedicke et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: