Retrospective analysis improved artifact correction in MRI images, indicating enhanced diagnostic reliability.
Motivation: MRI scans have inherently lengthy acquisition times, making them susceptible to motion artifacts that can degrade AI performance and compromise clinical diagnoses accuracy. Goal(s): Our goal was to incorporate wavelet transformations and adaptive multi-loss functions to optimize artifact correction and achieve more accurate, high-quality MRI images Approach: Our method integrates wavelet transformations within a refinement U-Net architecture, combined with adaptive multi-loss normalization, to accurately address artifact correction using real motion patterns from motion-free MRI scans. Results: Our method achieved significant improvements, raising SSIM from 76.85% to 92.92% and PSNR from 24.96 to 32.78, demonstrating effective artifact correction and surpassing other retrospective methods. Impact: Correcting motion artifacts in MRI scans enhances image quality, making them more reliable for clinical diagnosis. Additionally, using this approach as a preprocessing step for tasks like registration and segmentation boosts model accuracy and supports improved diagnostic outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hassan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: