PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 17, 2025Ethnographisch-archäologische Zeitschrift/Ethnographisch-archäologische Zeitschrift3 citations

Becoming Neanderthal

View Full Paper
GMGianpiero Di Maida

Key Points

  • Neanderthals showed cognitive capacity comparable to anatomically modern humans, influencing their survival potential.
  • Initial review highlights cognitive aspects but expands to include broader existential frameworks based on archaeological evidence.
  • Examination of Neanderthal life through anthropological theories offers unique insights into their societal practices and thought.
  • The study suggests re-evaluating established narratives about Neanderthals to include diverse facets of their existence.

Abstract

The vexata quaestio of Neanderthals’ cognitive capacity in comparison with anatomically modern humans – and the role this may have played in their demise as a separate species – has attracted extensive attention in archaeological studies of the past half-century. In contrast, other aspects of Neanderthal life and thought have received far less interest. Following an initial review of cognitive aspects and their ramifications, necessary to clarify the author’s opinion on this debated matter, the paper attempts to expand the horizon and break this ‘cognitive circle’ by examining Neanderthal ways of being-in-the-world, based on the available archaeological record and selected theoretical approaches in anthropology from a comparative perspective.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gianpiero Di Maida (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d45b3431b076d99fa5dd88https://doi.org/10.54799/kpox9368
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper