Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This observational study evaluates digital mindfulness training outcomes for TIN individuals and Cisgender counterparts, indicating varying levels of stress and life satisfaction.
Introduction: A mindfulness-based online intervention can be as effective as face-to-face training in Cisgender persons.Aim: This study compares MBSR training effects in TIN* individuals to Cis persons.Methods: 236 subjects were divided into a TIN* experimental group (n = 34) and a Cis group (n = 202), both receiving digital training in the longitudinal studie. All subjects completed questionnaires on their mindfulness skills (Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS)), life satisfaction (Fragebogen zur allgemeinen Lebenszufriedenheit (FLZ)), and stress and recovery (RESTQ) before and after training. TIN* individuals also completed the Utrecht Gender Dysphoria Scale (UGDS) at two points.Results: Mindfulness, life satisfaction with health, and fatigue improved similarly over the training in TIN* and Cis individuals. Gender dysphoria remained unchanged. TIN* individuals reported more stress, lower life satisfaction, and mindfulness than Cis individuals, independent of MBSR training.Conclusion: Digital MBSR training is effective for TIN* persons. Differential effects compared to Cis persons weren't found, but TIN* persons reported higher stress and lower life satisfaction, indicating a need for tailored interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: