Analysis of a rare double-source-plane lens reveals insights on cosmological parameters, suggesting improvements to dark-energy constraints.
Strong gravitational lenses with two background sources at widely separated redshifts are a promising independent probe of cosmological parameters. We can use these systems, known as double-source-plane lenses (DSPLs), to measure the ratio ( β ) of angular-diameter distances of the sources, which is sensitive to the matter density (Ω m ) and the equation-of-state parameter for dark-energy ( w ). However, DSPLs are rare and require high-resolution imaging and spectroscopy for detection, lens modeling, and measuring β . Here, we report only the second DSPL ever used to measure cosmological parameters. We model the DSPL AGEL 150745+052256 from the ASTRO 3D Galaxy Evolution with Lenses ( AGEL ) survey using Hubble Space Telescope/Wide-Field Camera 3 imaging and Keck Cosmic Web Imager spectroscopy. The spectroscopic redshifts for the deflector and two sources in AGEL 1507 are z defl = 0.594, z S1 = 2.163, and z S2 = 2.591. We measure a stellar velocity dispersion of σ obs = 109 ± 27 km s −1 for the nearer source (S1). Using σ obs for the main deflector (from literature) and S1, we test the robustness of our DSPL model. We measure β = 0.95 3 − 0.010 + 0.008 for AGEL 1507 and infer Ω m = 0.3 3 − 0.23 + 0.38 for ΛCDM cosmology. Combining AGEL 1507 with the published model of the Jackpot lens improves the precision on Ω m (ΛCDM) and w ( w CDM) by ∼10%. The inclusion of DSPLs significantly improves the constraints when combined with Planck’s cosmic microwave background observations, enhancing the precision on w by 30%. This paper demonstrates the potential constraining power of DSPLs and their complementarity to other standard cosmological probes. Tighter future constraints from larger DSPL samples discovered from ongoing and forthcoming large-area sky surveys would provide insights into the nature of dark energy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sahu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: