This research compares regulatory frameworks for online examinations in India and the US, indicating gaps in legal protections and data protection.
This research compares Indian regulations with those of other countries, especially the US, to provide a quantitative analysis of the regulatory environment for online examinations. Data were gathered from 120 individuals using stratified random sampling and a validated Likert-scale study. Examined were key characteristics such as student rights, proctoring and authentication, legal protections, technical preparedness, access and equality, and data protection. In order to guarantee widespread accessibility, the poll was conducted online using Google Forms, email, and financial platforms. T-tests and an analysis of the statistical differences between Indian and foreign practices were conducted using SPSS software. Significant differences were found, with international regulatory frameworks particularly in technologically developed countries showing better resilience, inclusion, and flexibility in response to the changing nature of online education. Even though it is improving, India's regulatory framework still has issues with inconsistent laws, gaps in execution, and other issues. The report emphasises how important it is for Indian authorities to implement changes that support safe, fair, and effective online testing systems and embrace global best practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: