PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 17, 2025Frontiers in Oncology1 citationsOpen Access

Histopathological grading affects survival in patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype gliomas

View Full Paper
ZHZiming HouDLDongyuan LiuZHZ. L. Hou

Key Points

  • Histopathological grade is an important independent prognostic factor for survival in IDH-wildtype gliomas.
  • Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that a higher histopathological grade correlates with poorer overall and progression-free survival.
  • The study involved 647 patients from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas with a median follow-up time of 100.4 months.
  • Findings suggest clinicians should consider histopathological grade and molecular characteristics when treating IDH-wildtype gliomas.

Abstract

Background The World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (2021) defines lower-grade (WHO grade II/III) isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type astrocytoma as glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, WHO grade 4. However, this definition is conditional. Notably, the traditional histopathological grade is no longer used, and the independent prognostic factor of tumor grade in IDH wild-type gliomas remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine if histopathological grade is an independent prognostic factor. Methods The clinical data and pathological information of 647 patients with IDH wild-type gliomas from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) database (2006-2019) were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were stratified according to histopathological grade and its prognostic significance in IDH wild-type gliomas. Univariate and Cox’s multivariate analyses were used to determine the prognostic significance. Results The median follow-up time was 100.4 months, and the median survival time was 20.3 months. The histopathological grade was an important independent prognostic factor in the univariate and multivariate analyses, and a higher grade was associated with poor overall survival and progression-free survival. After further stratification by the extent of resection and postoperative adjuvant treatment, the histopathological grade remained a significant prognostic factor. Conclusions In this study, histopathological grade affected survival in IDH-wild-type gliomas. This effect appears to be independent of the extent of resection and postoperative treatment. Thus, we suggest that clinical treatment of patients with IDH wild-type gliomas should continue to consider histopathological grade along with the molecular characteristics of the tumors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hou et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d45e6231b076d99fa5ec14https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1570941
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1TERT promoter mutation: is it enough to call a WHO grade II astrocytoma IDH wild-type glioblastoma?2021 · 23 citations
  2. 2The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary2021 · 12,447 citations
  3. 3IDH-wildtype lower-grade diffuse gliomas: the importance of histological grade and molecular assessment for prognostic stratification2020 · 140 citations
  4. 4Integrated DNA methylation and copy-number profiling identify three clinically and biologically relevant groups of anaplastic glioma2014 · 193 citations
  5. 5IDH mutation status and role of WHO grade and mitotic index in overall survival in grade II–III diffuse gliomas2015 · 354 citations