Background We assessed whether participants in the EZI-PrEP study, a non-inferiority trial evaluating online and six-monthly monitoring of oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), represent the broader population of PrEP users in the Netherlands. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using routinely collected data from September 2021 to August 2022 at four sexual health centres (SHCs) in the Netherlands. Socio-demographic characteristics, sexual behaviour, and prevalence of bacterial STIs were compared between EZI-PrEP participants at baseline and other PrEP users during their first PrEP monitoring visit in said time period. Results: The analysis included 469 EZI-PrEP participants and 5196 other PrEP users; respectively 99% and 96% were men who have sex with men (MSM). EZI-PrEP participants were less often transgender or gender divers persons (TGDP) (1% vs. 4%, p<0.001), older (median age=36 vs. 34 years, p=0.004), more often born in the Netherlands (68% vs. 58%, p<0.001), and more often completed a university/college degree (81% vs. 76%, p=0.01). They reported more group sex (38% vs. 33%, p=0.023) and condomless anal sex (95% vs. 92%, p=0.004), but less often sex work (1% vs. 6%, p<0.001). Prevalence of bacterial STIs was similar between groups (19% vs 18%, p=0.766). Conclusions: The similar STI prevalence suggests comparable risk for HIV acquisition among EZI-PrEP participants and other PrEP users, making EZI-PrEP study outcomes applicable to a broader population of PrEP users. However, under-representation of TGDPs, sex workers, individuals not born in the Netherlands, and individuals without university or college degree may limit generalizability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bruinderink et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: