This comparative analysis evaluates dynamic complexity and statistical independence in chaotic systems, suggesting Lorenz is superior for cryptography.
Chaotic systems, governed by deterministic nonlinear equations yet exhibiting highly complex and unpredictable behaviors, have emerged as valuable tools at the intersection of mathematics, engineering, and information security. This paper presents a comparative study of the Lorenz and Rössler systems, focusing on their dynamic complexity and statistical independence—two critical properties for applications in chaos-based cryptography. By integrating techniques from nonlinear dynamics (e.g., Lyapunov exponents, KS entropy, Kaplan–Yorke dimension) and statistical testing (e.g., chi-square and Gaussian transformation-based independence tests), we provide a quantitative framework to evaluate the pseudo-randomness potential of chaotic trajectories. Our results show that the Lorenz system offers faster convergence to chaos and superior statistical independence over time, making it more suitable for rapid encryption schemes. In contrast, the Rössler system provides complementary insights due to its simpler attractor and longer memory. These findings contribute to a multidisciplinary methodology for selecting and optimizing chaotic systems in secure communication and signal processing contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexandru Dinu (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: