Comparative analysis evaluates congestion detection in sustainable mobility using C-ITS and fundamental diagram methods, indicating distinct strengths.
Traffic congestion is a primary obstacle to sustainable mobility, leading to increased fuel consumption, harmful emissions, and significant economic losses. Effective and timely congestion detection is therefore a critical enabler for proactive traffic management strategies that can mitigate these negative impacts. This study contributes to this goal by conducting a rigorous comparative analysis of two key detection paradigms: a modern, vehicle-centric approach using a Cooperative Intelligent Transportation Systems (C-ITS) service, and a traditional, infrastructure-based method relying on the fundamental diagram (FD). Using a comprehensive simulation campaign on a bottleneck scenario, we evaluate the performance of both methods under various conditions. The results demonstrate that while the FD-based method can offer faster detection under optimal sensor placement for severe events, the C-ITS approach provides fundamentally greater spatial flexibility and reliability across a wider range of congestion severities. Our techno-economic analysis further reveals that the paradigms rely on distinct investment models, with C-ITS offering superior scalability and a promising path toward network-wide coverage. This highlights the complementary nature of the two approaches and underscores the potential of C-ITS as a key technology to support dynamic, efficient, and sustainable transportation networks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coppola et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: